The Good Patch: Difference between revisions
From Maemo Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>qgil Based on Andre Klapper's input |
imported>amigadave add wikipedia link |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Characteristics of a good patch == | |||
A good patch should: | |||
* be in [[:wikipedia:Diff#Unified_format|unified context format]] (<code>diff -u</code>) | |||
** alternatively, be generated with <pre>git format-patch</pre> | |||
* only include related changes | |||
* not introduce any compile time warnings | |||
* have test code (if any) separate from the added/changed functionality | |||
* not add any extra debug printing, unless absolutely necessary | |||
* match the coding style of the existing source file, for example with regard to indentation and whitespace | |||
When attaching a patch to a bug at https://bugs.maemo.org/, add the "patch" keyword to the bug report. | |||
[[Category:Development]] | |||
Latest revision as of 13:16, 2 February 2011
Characteristics of a good patch
A good patch should:
- be in unified context format (
diff -u)- alternatively, be generated with
git format-patch
- alternatively, be generated with
- only include related changes
- not introduce any compile time warnings
- have test code (if any) separate from the added/changed functionality
- not add any extra debug printing, unless absolutely necessary
- match the coding style of the existing source file, for example with regard to indentation and whitespace
When attaching a patch to a bug at https://bugs.maemo.org/, add the "patch" keyword to the bug report.