Open development/Why the closed packages: Difference between revisions

From Maemo Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>qgil
New page: == General reasons == Open source is the licensing model preferred by Nokia in the development of Maemo. There are some reasons to have exceptions, though: - '''Brand''': Nokia wants to k...
 
imported>andre
Adding four requests from Bugzilla
Line 14: Line 14:
== Specific reasons for packages ==
== Specific reasons for packages ==
If you want to know the specific reasons for a package to be closed please list it below.
If you want to know the specific reasons for a package to be closed please list it below.
[[User:Andre|Andre]]: Adding the four requests that we have in Bugzilla:
* [https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1235 Media player]
* [https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3195 Connection applet]
* [https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3199 Display applet]
* [https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3635 Alarm framework]

Revision as of 14:04, 4 October 2008

General reasons

Open source is the licensing model preferred by Nokia in the development of Maemo. There are some reasons to have exceptions, though:

- Brand: Nokia wants to keep a strong brand and identity avoiding any risks of dilution.

- Differentiation: Nokia wants to gain competitive advantage in certain areas by keeping the related software closed.

- Legacy: Nokia keeps some components minimally maintained - the work of opening them has an unclear outcome.

- IPR & licensing issues: Nokia avoids serious risks brought by patents, copyrights or complicated licensing situations.

- Third party: Nokia does not own the code and therefore does not decide on the license.

Specific reasons for packages

If you want to know the specific reasons for a package to be closed please list it below.

Andre: Adding the four requests that we have in Bugzilla: