Talk:Diablo Extras repository proposal: Difference between revisions
From Maemo Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>xfade New page: == Discussion page for Diablo extras repository proposal == Leave your comments here --~~~~ |
imported>khertan |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Leave your comments here --[[User:xfade|xfade]] 08:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC) | Leave your comments here --[[User:xfade|xfade]] 08:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
If i understand well, only package build with autobuilder could be uploaded. If it s the case, i don't think it s a good solution for onboard developpers, as debian tool can't be used directly on the it. If diablo let s us use debian packaging tool directly on tablet it ll not be a problem. (The main problem using dpkg-buildpackage is that many option of many tools aren't available due to busybox). | |||
Furthermore, if there is too difficulty to upload to extras or extras-devel, many dev will make their own repository. And i don't think it s a good idea. But i understand that you want to have a repository were users can rely on and where there is no error on installing packages. | |||
Revision as of 09:01, 19 June 2008
Discussion page for Diablo extras repository proposal
Leave your comments here --xfade 08:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
If i understand well, only package build with autobuilder could be uploaded. If it s the case, i don't think it s a good solution for onboard developpers, as debian tool can't be used directly on the it. If diablo let s us use debian packaging tool directly on tablet it ll not be a problem. (The main problem using dpkg-buildpackage is that many option of many tools aren't available due to busybox).
Furthermore, if there is too difficulty to upload to extras or extras-devel, many dev will make their own repository. And i don't think it s a good idea. But i understand that you want to have a repository were users can rely on and where there is no error on installing packages.
